|
Home Who Teaching Research Services Writing book series
L1-Journal Webpresentations Smikkelclub
European Network on Writing Research |
|
| |
The European Research Network on Learning to Write Effectively |
| |
|
Workgroup 2: Improving written communication in education and in the workplace
Expertise pool Work group 2 |
Activity in this workgroup is motivated by
the following questions...
1.
What relationships between L1 and L2 inform
the design of effective learning environments to foster effective L2 writing
processes? What effect do various learner characteristics (L2 proficiency,
vocabulary (L1,
L2),
reading skill,
writing
strategy preference) and task variables (task condition,
writing medium,
topic,
use of sources) affect the writing process and the
relation between process and text quality?
2.
What
relationships between the language specific definitions/concepts of genres (at
the level of secondary and higher education) inform the design of effective
environments to foster effective L2 writing processes? Analyses on various
levels (theory,
practice,
text books,
instruction,
evaluation) in various L1’s (various languages),
compared with ‘Global English’? What are
distinctive and what are common features?
Keywords
Writing
skills,
mother tongue,
ESOL,
writing
instruction,
writing strategies,
writing in the workplace,
classroom teaching,
professional
writing
Leaders
Gert
Rijlaarsdam,
Graduate
School
of
Teaching
and Learning,
University
of
Amsterdam
Address: Spinozastraat 55,
1081
HJ
Amsterdam,
the
Netherlands
Phone
+31 20 5251288
E-Mail:
G.C.W.
Rijlaarsdam
@uva.nl (Workgroup
2.1)
Otto
Kruse,
Zurich
University
of Applied Sciences ZHAW (Workgroup 2.2)
Address:
Department of Applied Linguistics,
Theaterstr. 17,
Postfach,
CH-8401
Winterthur,
Switzerland
Phone:
+41 58 934 6172
E-Mail: kreo@zhaw.ch
Aim
The overall aim of this workgroup is to support the
improvement of written communication,
both
in education and in the workplace.
We aim to deliver course design parameters for
effective L2 training situations (supported by L1-training situations),
informed by analyses of the
1.
relation of two major phenomena in L1 and L2 writing,
2.
relation between writing processes in L1 and L2
3.
relation between L1 specific concepts of genres and L2
concepts of genre
4.
understanding the factors
favouring the development of expertise in writing in L1 and L2.
Program 2.1 Improving writing in L1 and L2
The aim will be to identify the conditions for
successful transfers between L1 and L2 writing strategies,
provided learner and task characteristics,
and to set up the course design parameters for effective
L2 learning-to-write environments. It also aims at establishing a common set of
course materials that can be used in various settings to L2-writing
instruction.
Sub
Programme 2.1.ATransfer between L1 and L2 writing strategies
Studies will be identified to analyse the relationship
between L1 and L2 writing processes. Studies must have data on (1) processes
(online writing behaviour measures via keystroke logging,
probe reaction time,
think
aloud protocols,
self-reports
during writing),
(ii) quality of
resulting texts,
(iii) learner
characteristics and (iv) task characteristics. Studies may focus on L1 and/or
L2. Studies may purely descriptive,
explanatory
(factors that explain certain processes) or interventional (the effects of a
certain intervention programme are studied on writing processes and text
quality). We will identify finished studies,
current
studies and research proposals. All relevant research materials will be
collected
Deliverables
|
Work group members active
|
1. Inventory of studies (short descriptions,
available via repository with free access,
with studies and research materials)
|
??? |
2. Review L1 & L2 writing processes,
Effects of L1-writing competency on L2-writing,
and other exploratory factors for variation in
L2-writing competency.
|
Anna Iñesta-Codina; Mariona Corcelles; Montserrat_Castelló; Mar Matteos, Martin, Cuevas |
3. Data: Research materials: Texts and Rating
systems,
Processes (inputlog,
writing
process protocols),
Interventions.
|
Anna Iñesta-Codina; Mariona Corcelles; Montserrat_Castelló; Mar Matteos; Martin; Cuevas
|
4. Data: Selection of writing processes
(video and/or audio taped think aloud protocols,
inputlog/scriptlog keylog data)
for educational purposes (in repository). Selected are examples of
key-processes like the use of sources,
planning,
goal setting,
evaluation,
revision.
|
???
|
5. Set up of trial study: re-use of writing
processes in educational settings.
|
????
|
Sub program 2.1.B Analysis of
effective interventions
All intervention studies identified will be analyzed
(content: which strategies were trained; methodology: which learning activities
were stimulated,
in which order,
etc.).
Deliverables
|
Work group members active
|
1. A selection of effective course materials
for strategy training (available online in repository,
free access).
|
??? |
2. Review paper identifying course design
parameters
|
Anna Iñesta-Codina; Mariona Corcelles; Montserrat_Castelló
|
3. Set up of a trial: re-use of labor intensive course materials in interventions studies
|
????
|
Study 1
In one or in two different L1-situations,
a trial study will be set up where research
materials from other studies are re-used in a different L1-context. A selection
of the videotapes and think-aloud protocols (see 3.2.1.,
product 4) will be used to help students learn to write
effectively in L2,
through observing
and comparing other writers at work. Students will be able to see and hear
‘models’ undertaking reading,
planning,
formulation and revision phases. Possibly these
course writing processes will be embedded in a strategy focuses training (like
CSRI,
for instance (
Torrance,
Fidalgo & Garcia,
2007).
The text that is studied will be an expository text,
i.e.
an important genre for research and business communication. Performances will
be recorded (keystroke logging using,
for
example,
Inputlog Scriptlog),
and
analyzed via a standard analysis protocol. If possible,
the results of the intervention will be compared with those
of students receiving traditional instruction.
Study 2
Other re-uses will be tested,
using course materials identified in the analysis
of effective interventions. These learning situations will be tested on the
same principles,
but with other
participants and in other contexts,
notably
“peer learning” in workplace settings (occupational training,
continuing education (Björk,
Bräuer,
Rienecker & Jörgensen,
2003).
Expertise pool
2.1.A Research on writing processes in L1 and L2,
with or without explanatory learner and task
characteristics,
as independent
variables (writing processes as such) or as dependent variables (writing
processes and text quality).
Prerequisites for participating in this group:
data/protocols on writing processes (in L1 and/or L2)
Optional: text quality scores,
other learner characteristics that can explain variation in
writing processes.
2.1.B: Research on
strategy-oriented interventions aiming at L1 and/or L2.
Prerequisite to participate in this Group: Available:
videotaped course materials (strategy videoclips,
from peers or experts).
|
2.1.A
|
2.1.B
|
Present in Barcelona |
| Eva Lindgren,
Sweden
|
X
|
|
n |
| Berit Lundgren,
Sweden
|
X
|
|
n |
| Kirk Sullivan, Sweden |
X
|
|
n |
| Åsa Nordqvist Palviainen,
Finland
|
X
|
|
y handout |
| Maarit Mutta, Finland |
X
|
|
y |
| Ana Cristina Silva,
Portugal
|
X
|
|
n |
| Daphne van Weijen,
the Netherlands
|
X
|
|
n |
| Martine Braaksma, the Netherlands |
X
|
X
|
n presentation |
| Marion Tillema, the Netherlands |
X
|
|
y |
| Veerle Baaijen, the Netherlands |
X
|
|
y |
| Rosa M. Manchón, Spain |
X
|
|
n |
| Julio Roca de Larios,
Spain
|
X
|
|
y |
| Liz Murphy,
Spain
|
X
|
|
n |
|
Florentina Nicolás Conesa,
Spain
|
X
|
|
y |
|
Sonia López Serrano,
Spain
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
y handout |
|
X
|
|
n |
| Elena Martin,
Spain
|
X
|
|
y |
| Isabel Cuevas,
Spain
|
X
|
|
y |
| Ruth Villalón,
Spain
|
X
|
|
n |
| Isabel Sole.doc,
Spain
|
X
|
|
|
|
Nuria Castells,
Spain
|
X
|
|
|
| Sandra Espino,
Spain
|
X
|
|
n |
|
Mariet Raedts
,
Belgium
|
X
|
X |
n |
| Marie-Laure Barbier,
France
|
X
|
|
n |
| Kristyan Spelman Miller,
England
|
X
|
|
n |
| Daniel Perrin,
Switserland
|
X
|
|
|
|
Thierry Olive
,
France
|
X
|
|
n |
| Luc van Waes,
Belgium
|
X
|
|
|
| Marielle Leijten,
Belgium
|
X
|
|
|
| Elke van Steendam,
Belgium
|
|
X
|
y |
| Michel Couzijn,
the Netherlands
|
|
X
|
n |
| Talita Groenendijk,
the Netherlands
|
x
|
x
|
n |
| Jesús Nicasio Garcia,
Spain
|
x |
x
|
y |
|
Deilis I Pacheco,
Spain
|
x
|
x
|
n |
| Ana Mª de Caso,
Spain
|
|
X
|
|
| Raquel Fidalgo,
Spain
|
|
X
|
n |
| Olga Arias-Gundín,
Spain
|
|
x
|
n |
|
Montserrat Castelló,
Spain
|
X
|
X
|
y |
| Anna Iñesta,
Spain
|
X
|
X
|
y |
|
Mariona Corcelles
,
Spain
|
X |
X
|
y |
| Marta Pardo,
Spain
|
X |
X
|
|
|
Dolors González,
Spain
|
x
|
X
|
|
| Annie Piolat,
France
|
?? |
??
|
n |
|
Lucia Lumbelli,
Italy
|
|
X
|
n |
|
Gisella Paoletti,
Italy
|
|
x
|
n |
| Joachim Brunstein,
Germany
|
|
X
|
n |
| Cornelia Glaser,
Germany
|
|
X
|
n |
| Astrid Neumann
|
|
|
y handout abstract |
| Karen Harris,
USA
|
|
X
|
n |
| Charles MacArthur,
USA
|
|
x
|
y |
| Anna Rosa Guerriero, Italy |
x |
|
y handhout |
| Carmen dell'Ascenza, Italy |
X |
x |
y |
| Mark Torrance, England |
|
x |
y |
| David Galbraith, England |
x |
|
y |
| Victoria Johansson, Sweden |
x |
|
y |
| Gert Rijlaarsdam, the Netherlands |
X |
X |
y (1) handout (2) general WG presentation |
| Huub van den Bergh, the Netherlands |
x |
x |
y |

Universiteit van Amsterdam
Graduate School of Teaching and Learning
|